With DJI-Drones banned by the government for months, with lawmakers questioning the company’s information to the Chinese government, the Pentagon has acknowledged that the drones used may indeed be safe (through Hill), according to the report two “Government Edition” DJI drones are “recommended for use by general government”.
However, the Ministry of Defense on July 23 issued an opinion of the report, saying its publication was “unauthorized” and reiterating its position that DJI’s drones “pose potential threats to national security”. (Through Reuters) It states that its policy on drones has not changed and that the publication of “inaccurate and uncoordinated” reports is being investigated.
Last year, the Interior Ministry grounded all its drones, citing concerns about possible espionage by the Chinese government and the Ministry of Commerce put a DJI in its entity list after the company claimed to have provided the Chinese government with surveillance technology for Uighur Muslim prisoners. This second argument was not addressed at all in the Pentagon report.
But according to Hill, A (unauthorized) Pentagon report found that it did not find malicious code when analyzing the two drone models. Ministry of Domestic Security in the past conducted tests DJI Mavic Pro and Matrice 600 Pro in 2019, and found no evidence of sending data to places where it should not be, and the new administration has seemingly come to a similar conclusion today. Second report who watched three DJI drones, including the government facilities of the above aircraft, came to the same conclusion in early 2020.
The Pentagon report was not entirely clear about the DJI’s relationship with the U.S. government even before the DOD statement on July 23rd. From June 1 update, DJI is still on the entity list, preventing U.S. companies from selling any of their technology to DJI, and a Pentagon report will come during Congress considering the law it would prevent the government from buying Chinese drones for five years from 2023 onwards. Instead, they should rely on other approved drones from companies in the United States and France; Because there are restrictions on DJI, others have made drones with hefty price tags to meet the needs of the government.
We’re also talking about pretty old DJI drones that have gotten everything clear; we looked at DJI’s Mavic Pro consumer model in 2016, and the company offered many much more competitive models since then.
No government review will stop you from buying a DJI drone. Despite all the accusations, the DJI has still unable continue to create and sell consumer products.
Lawmakers continue to try to decide what to do with other Chinese products that are perceived to pose a security risk: even if the Ministry of Defense has reinstated the appointment From Xiaomi to “Chinese Communist Military Enterprise,” Biden’s regime it seems it is still going to considers the use of Huawei products in U.S. infrastructure. The government has been so concerned about the equipment of Chinese companies such as ZTE and Huawei that operate as part of its network infrastructure that it has even considered removing components already in use. Last September The FCC estimates it will cost $ 1.8 billion “copy and replace” Chinese telecommunications equipment currently embedded in U.S. networks.
Update July 25: Updated to reflect the fact that the Department of Defense has issued a statement calling the publication of the Pentagon’s original report “unauthorized” and “inaccurate.”