Samsung Galaxy A52 and the Galaxy A72 duo have been on the market for a few months. We’ve already tested the Galaxy A52, and now it’s our turn Galaxy A72. It is priced at around Rs. 7,000 higher than the Galaxy A52, and for that extra money you get a slightly bigger screen, a bigger battery and a camera.
However, Rs. 34,999 for the basic option with 8 GB of RAM and 128 storage spaces or R memory. With 37,999 and 256GB of storage, the Samsung Galaxy A72 has pretty tough competition with people like OnePlus 8T, Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and Vivo X60. If you stretch your budget close to Rs. 40,000, you might even get Mi 11X Pro with Snapdragon 888 SoC. The Galaxy A72 really needs to make a strong case for itself if we are going to recommend it over the competition. Let’s find out if it’s good enough.
Samsung Galaxy A72 design
The Samsung Galaxy A72 has a fresh new design, similar to what we saw in the Galaxy A52. It is simple and elegant and is available in several pastel colors. I have an awesome purple cut that looks soothing, and thanks to the matte finish, fingerprints aren’t a problem. The body and back are made of plastic, and this phone looks relatively sturdy, although it doesn’t feel very high when you hold it. I fully understand the use of a plastic body for the Galaxy A52, but at least I would have expected the glass back to the more expensive Galaxy A72. The phone is a bit heavy at 203 g, but not too thick at just 8.3 mm.
The 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display has Full HD + resolution and a refresh rate of 90 Hz and supports HDR playback. I found the screen quality to be good, brighter than average, and more piercing. A blue color change is visible when you look at white backgrounds outside the axis, but I didn’t notice this to be too distracting. The ports and buttons on the Samsung Galaxy A72 are well placed. You get a headphone jack of up to 3.5 mm. All openings are weatherproof as the phone is IP67 rated for dust and water resistance.
The other slot on the SIM card can support either another Nano-SIM card or a microSD card. In the package you will find a 25 W power supply with a USB Type-C port, a corresponding USB cable and a SIM card removal tool. You do not get a headset or case with this phone.
Samsung Galaxy A72 specifications and software
The core specifications of the Samsung Galaxy A72 are almost identical to the features of the Galaxy A52 and it is a bit disappointing considering the price difference. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G is simply not meant to compete with its own higher siblings, the Snapdragon 865, 870 and even 888, all found in R-priced phones. 40,000. This phone has 8GB of RAM and either 128GB or 256GB of storage. You also get Bluetooth 5, dual-band Wi-Fi ac, NFC and standard sensors and satellite navigation systems.
The Samsung Galaxy A72 has a screen fingerprint sensor, but I found it to be very inconsistent with authentication and also a bit slow. Face recognition works better, but not much, and it didn’t recognize my face in dark environments.
The software obligations are performed by OneUI 3.1, which is exactly the same as what we saw on the Galaxy A52. OneUI is versatile and looks polished. Samsung Pay offers contactless payments in stores. I didn’t notice ads in apps like Weather, but there are a lot of pre-installed apps, most of which seemed unnecessary. Fortunately, it is possible to remove them all. Some of Samsung’s own apps, such as My Galaxy, tend to confuse your notification page, and there’s little to do to stop this.
Samsung Galaxy A72 performance and battery life
The Snapdragon 720G SoC is pretty inefficient compared to the competition at this price, but it’s still powerful enough to handle Android 11. During my inspection, there were a few cases where I felt a little sluggish in multitasking, but this was not too serious. Browsing the list of applications felt fast thanks to the high refresh rate of the screen. The performance of the benchmarks was also pretty stable, with the Samsung Galaxy A72 getting a respectable 3,36,261 points in AnTuTu. The phone has a physically large footprint, so using one hand is not the most comfortable.
In addition to the benchmarks, the games also ran really well. Even demanding titles like Genshin’s Impact ran at well-playable frame rates with only a few slight stuttering at times. The stereo speakers become powerful and sound good. You can also turn on the Dolby Atmos function on the speakers, which slightly increases the sound quality. I didn’t notice any overheating with the Samsung Galaxy A72, even in graphically demanding games. The videos were also very enjoyable, especially the HDR content, which really makes the screen shine.
The Samsung Galaxy A72 has a larger 5000 mAh battery than the Galaxy A52, and yet our HD video loop test took about an hour less with this phone (16 hours 28 minutes). The included 25W charger managed to charge the phone’s battery from zero to about 48 percent in half an hour and up to 87 percent in an hour, which isn’t bad.
Samsung Galaxy A72 cameras
The camera settings on the Samsung Galaxy A72 are similar to those on the Galaxy A52, except that the depth camera has been changed to a more useful 8 megapixel camera. The latter has an aperture of f / 2.2, 3x optical zoom range and optical stability. The other cameras are the 64 megapixel main camera, the 12 megapixel ultra wide camera and the 5 megapixel macro camera. You also get a 32 megapixel selfie camera.
Photographs taken by the main camera were generally higher than average in good light. The scenery had good details, the colors looked natural and the dynamic range was decent. The field of view of a very wide camera is pretty good, even though objects holding the edges of the frames looked stretched. The close-ups looked very good, with pleasant depth and sharp details. The macro camera was a little disappointing, but I didn’t expect much from it.
The tele-camera took strictly average photos even in good light. The details and textures weren’t very sharp even at the original zoom level, and they gradually softened as I went above it. Personally, I often found that the phone would simply digitally zoom in on the primary sensor in 3X mode, even in good lighting.
In low light, the Samsung Galaxy A72 automatically uses a long exposure, which means that there is usually very little or no difference between a normal photo and a photo taken at night. However, if you plan to shoot with an ultra-wide camera, there is a big difference in night mode. The phone never connects to the camera at night, and even if the subject is properly lit, it could go in either direction.
The self-camera is not bad whether you are shooting during the day or at dusk. The selfies looked good, with pleasant details and skin tones. Selfie night mode is not much help, so you better use the screen flash.
The Samsung Galaxy A72 can shoot up to 4K 30 frames per second video with rear and front cameras. The video quality is good during the day and in low light. 4K stabilization doesn’t seem to be affected very little (at least electronically), but as a result, there’s no worries in low-light videos as you walk and shoot. The camera app also lets you switch between the main camera and a very wide camera when shooting with 4K.
You get plenty of playable shooting modes, including Single Take, which captures multiple images from the rear sensors and automatically applies filters, creates GIFs, etc. based on what you’ve shot. There’s also a fun shooting mode that lets you apply Snapchat filters to your subject.
As it turns out, Samsung Galaxy A72 is not too different Galaxy A52, and that’s the problem. The TV camera is a nice addition, but I didn’t find it very useful because its picture quality was average at best. In addition to this, you pay a premium for the Galaxy A52’s slightly larger battery and the included 25W charger. It is difficult to justify the use of at least R. 34,999 for the Galaxy A72 when you get almost the same performance and features as the Galaxy A52 at Rs. 26499, and some phones are priced below Rs. The 30,000 offers even better technical features and capabilities.
The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a good looking phone, but like the others at this price, which makes them both a better choice. There is Mi 10T Pro and OnePlus 8T, both of which offer better gaming performance and cameras. Vivo’s X60 also looks good on paper, although we haven’t tested it.
If Samsung’s name and features like IP rating and stereo speakers pulled you towards the Galaxy A72, I recommend buying the Galaxy A52 instead and saving money. If you definitely want to spend more, any of the above competitors would be better to buy.