Supervisory Board to announce soon if Donald Trump returns to Facebook- Technology News, Firstpost

[ad_1]

Former President Donald Trump will find out this week whether he will be able to return to Facebook with a decision that is likely to evoke strong emotions no matter which direction it goes. The almost independent Social Network Supervisory Board says it will announce its decision on the case of the former president on Wednesday. Trump’s account was suspended for inciting violence that resulted in the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol breasts. After years of treating Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric with a light touch Facebook and Instagram silenced his account on January 7th, saying at the time he was suspended “at least” by the end of his presidency.

Although Trump often wrote on Facebook – and his campaign was particularly adept at using social network advertising tools to reach potential voters – the forum he chose was always Twitter. But Twitter permanently banned him, without a supervisory board to kick the final decision.

While Trump isn’t always as high-profile as Twitter, Trump’s Facebook posts were widely shared, as were his conservative supporters like Ben Shapiro and Dan Bongino, who still garner millions of views and comments. In the meantime, on Twitter Fox news host Tucker Carlson seems to step into a conservative provocative lead role in the vacuum left by Trump.

“If they return him, Facebook claims this shows the independence of the government. If not, Facebook says its verdict on closing Trump is justified. They win the heads, we lose the tails. Reporters should know better than take this window dress seriously,” said Laurence Tribe, a professor at Harvard Law School. and Facebook and its panel as a member of the critical Real Facebook Supervisory Board.

File image of Donald Trump.  AP

File image of Donald Trump. AP

Facebook created a dashboard to decide on the awkward content of its ships in response to widespread criticism of its inability to respond quickly and effectively to misinformation, hate speech, and low-impact campaigns. Its decisions to date have emphasized freedom of expression and restriction of content.

In its first decisions, the panel overturned four of the five social network decisions remove questionable content. It ordered Facebook to return messages sent by users that the company reported violating standards for adult nudity, hate speech, or dangerous individuals.

This included a Myanmar user’s Burmese-language Facebook post about Muslims, which contained two widely shared images of a dead Syrian toddler, was offensive, but did not rise to the level of hate speech.

At the time, the government also announced that since it began accepting cases in October last year, more than 150,000 cases have been appealed to the panel. “Because we can’t hear every petition, we prioritize cases that may affect many users around the world that are critical to public debate or raise important questions about Facebook’s practices,” the government noted. The Facebook Board of Supervisors is responsible for making final decisions on complaints about what is removed or allowed to remain on the world’s largest social network. It considers cases involving Nazi propaganda, hate speech, nudity, pandemic misinformation, and dangerous individuals or organizations.

But none of the verdicts are as serious as this week’s decision on Trump. The government was scheduled to announce its decision last month, but it was delayed, it said, because it had to deal with more than 9,000 public comments.

The 20 members of the board, which will eventually grow to 40, include the former Prime Minister of Denmark, the former editor-in-chief of the Guardian newspaper, as well as jurists, human rights experts and journalists.

The first four board members were elected by Facebook. The four then worked with Facebook to select new members. Facebook pays a salary to each board member.

Critics have questioned the government’s independence, saying it is a Facebook public relations campaign designed to draw attention to the deeper problems of anger and misinformation that continue to flourish on its platforms.

“The Board of Supervisors is designed to harass journalists and decision-makers about the massive damage Facebook inflicts on a daily basis,” said Roger McNamee, an early investor on Facebook. “For a government to be considered legitimate, it must be accepted that a group built to look at a few cases a year is enough to oversee a forum that undermines democracy around the world, strengthens bans in a pandemic, claims a commitment to digital price fixing, promotes hate speech and distributes tens of millions harmful messages on a daily basis. “

Facebook regularly deletes thousands of messages and accounts, and about 150,000 of these cases have appealed to the Board of Supervisors since its launch in October 2020. The government has said it will prioritize reviewing cases that have potential implications for users around the world. .

The panel was set up late last year as concerns over abuse and manipulation have grown around the U.S. presidential election. The board was created at the urging of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg with the authority to overturn him and other top executives. Facebook is committed to binding decisions on complaints, but the decisions only apply to the cases in question and do not create precedents. However, decisions may include recommendations to change Facebook policies.

With feeds from the Associated Press

.

[ad_2]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *