Last Tuesday, AnandTech grabbed OnePlus by doing what was previously incomprehensible – strangling its new flagship smartphone, OnePlus 9 Pro. To see an unexplained slowdown, found publication the phone was moving the washing list of popular applications off From the high performance cores of the Snapdragon 888. Company excuse? It all tried to save battery.
Today, OnePlus doubles the previous statement with a longer forum post, where the company ‘s argument sounds downright reasonable. “In recent years, the performance of smartphone SoCs has reached a point where their power in certain situations often exceeds,” writes OnePlus, accusing Qualcomm of essentially too good for his job.
“In this sense, our team has shifted its focus from providing mere performance to the performance expected from our devices while reducing power consumption and heat generation,” adds OnePlus.
It sounds good! Here are three problems with a seemingly convincing argument:
First, OnePlus has been selling raw speed devices for years, despite the concentration of the OnePlus 9 Pro Hasselblad cameras, that is no exception. The company’s entire tag is “Never Settle,” and the company promised the OnePlus 9 Pro a “flawless” fast and smooth experience.
Second, if AnandTech is right, you seem to be settling here. According to the release, the phone was less responsive than the Galaxy S21 Ultra in parallel tests, despite the fact that its battery life was worse, although both use the same chips and the same display technology. The slowdown “applies to almost anything that has some popularity in the Play Store.”
Third and most importantly, OnePlus did not tell anyone. And now the company is trying to make it sound like the secretly strangling of the device may somehow never be okay.
This is a dangerous idea. If we find that a telephone caller can quietly gass on behalf of a user, what prevents him from doing so at any time? For years, conspiracy theories have revolved around how gadget manufacturers slow down or otherwise paralyze devices to force users to upgrade, and many of them were rejected in this way – conspiracy theories – until it was revealed that Apple really did something like that in 2017.
At the time, Apple also had a good excuse for how strangling it would save your phone’s battery, but that didn’t change the fact that the company hid it from users, allowing an unknown number of them to update their phones earlier than they might have needed. The company set up twice (once for $ 500 millionand once for $ 113 million) and increased capacity turn off the gorge, but Apple still largely normalizes the idea that its actions were in order, and brought the controversial processor choke feature to later phones as well.
When OnePlus realized it wanted to shift its focus away from “mere performance offering,” the time to tell us would have been on stage before people bought the phone, and it should have been packaged into a feature that you can turn on and off.
It’s the kind of relationship that fans of the company’s power users expect to have with OnePlus. It is a OnePlus brand. Now it is in danger of erosion.
Let’s not pretend this is normal or acceptable to OnePlus or another manufacturer.